Duty to “explain and apologise” for medical care incidents

A Statutory Duty of Candour may improve the experience of patients who suffer poor outcomes after medical treatment or medical negligence.

In December 2020, the Victorian Government announced its intention to introduce a Statutory Duty of Candour which would require health services to provide an apology where a patient has endured a serious medical event. The Duty is a supplementary mechanism to improve the compliance of, and support, the existing obligations of healthcare providers for open disclosure.

The Government says that a statutory duty of candour “is a legal obligation to ensure that consumers of healthcare and their families are apologised to, and communicated with, openly and honestly when things have gone wrong in their case.”

Whilst the apology would not amount to an admission of liability in legal proceedings, it is a welcome initiative and may improve the experience of patients who suffer poor outcomes after medical treatment or medical negligence. This initiative was recommended by a review of the Victorian health system undertaken by Dr Stephen Duckett.

The apology would be accompanied by the facts about what occurred, a description of the health service’s response and what has or will change in response to the incident. The factual explanations of what has occurred, which will be required to be provided under the duty, will not be protected and can be used as evidence in any legal proceedings.

In support of the individuals and families who commence medical negligence proceedings to try and effect change and ensure their experience is not repeated, or to find out what took place that resulted in their adverse outcome, Brave Legal welcomes any moves to increase transparency between health services and patients.

Contact Bree Knoester for more information about this announcement and/or to discuss a claim of medical negligence.

Share this article

Related articles

Brave Legal blog
News Personal Injury
When summer activities go wrong: Boating, cycling, motocross riding

Archer v Garcia is an interesting reminder that experienced and expert sporting individuals who have the capacity to make personal safety decisions, may find themselves uncompensated in the event of an injury.

3 min Bree Knoester
Medical negligence News
Medical Negligence 101 Guide

Undergoing medical treatment that doesn’t go as expected can be incredibly stressful, even more so when the outcome is due to negligent care.

9 min Emma Holden
Brave Legal News
My leave of absence at the University of Edinburgh

Senior Associate Jyoti Haikerwal shares insights into her mid-career health and ethics studies while on a Brave Legal leave of absence.

3 min Jyoti Haikerwal