Hybrid Working Here To Stay | LIJ

Personal injury law firm Brave Legal is bucking the trend of lawyers returning to the office, stating "we are loudly committed to a hybrid working environment”.

For many employees one of the positive effects of the pandemic was normalising the practice of working from home. But some law firms are now insisting their employees come back into the office full-time.

However one law firm owner bucking that trend is Brave Legal principal lawyer Bree Knoester, who says her firm is “loudly committed to a hybrid working environment”.

Ms Knoester, who set up her firm during COVID-19, says the pandemic showed it was possible to work productively and efficiently remotely.

“While there’s definitely a place for collaborating in the office, and I certainly wouldn’t want us to go back to 2020 and 2021 where we were at home full time, hybrid working is something we have decided to commit to long term.”

As a senior female practitioner Ms Knoester says she wants to create an environment where junior practitioners can be present in their family life in ways that weren’t available to her in a conventional working environment. “We are hybrid because we consider family first – and family can be a pet, a grandparent, an older parent, a child, a partner, or your mental or physical wellbeing.”

Working from home also provides introverts or extremely busy practitioners with valuable time to be productive away from distractions, she says. “We have an open plan environment, and even for me as an extroverted personality I need that day at home to really focus on a detailed task.”

It is still possible to collaborate and create learning opportunities for junior lawyers in the office with judicious scheduling, Ms Knoester says. “Our people have choice around how they work. And that comes back to autonomy which is one of the key factors for job satisfaction.”

To read the full article on the Law Institute of Victoria website, visit the link below.

Share this article

Related articles.

Medical negligence
Case study: Aggravated damages in medical negligence

Aggravated damages in medical negligence cases remain limited and uncertain in Australia, but international case law offers valuable insights.

4 min Emma Holden
Workers compensation
Settlements: The interplay between WorkCover and employment law

In this edition of Precedent, lawyers are reminded of the importance of clients’ legal advice history, payment characterisation, deeds, and collaboration in Workers’ Compensation and Employment matters.

7 min Anastasia Nagorny
Workers compensation
Case Note: Elisha v Vision Australia Limited [2024] – Disciplinary Processes & Employee Rights

High Court case Elisha v Vision Australia Limited [2024] highlights the importance of fair disciplinary processes and employees understanding their rights to pursue claims, even after settlement.

4 min Anastasia Nagorny